Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Fix psql doc typo.

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix psql doc typo.
Date: 2012-05-06 03:28:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 05/05/2012 12:36 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:04:24PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 5 May 2012 17:00, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>  wrote:
>>> Fix psql doc typo.
>> Are you sure about this?  Looked fine before.
> The change is:
>   -        For some types of relation,<literal>\d</>  shows additional information
>   +        For some types of relations,<literal>\d</>  shows additional information
> Isn't 'types' plural so 'relations' has to be plural.  I saw this while
> working on the release notes.

Yes, "types" is plural, but that doesn't mean that "relation" is 
necessarily wrong here, AFAIK. I don't see why you can't have plural 
types of a singular category. If you can cite a rule of English grammar 
to the contrary I'd like to see it.



In response to


pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-05-06 12:11:05
Subject: pgsql: Revert typo fix 768c3affd44d1dcb4e43e2e006c642524714c2a4; I was
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-05-05 16:36:41
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix psql doc typo.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group