Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andres(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, aakash(dot)bits(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)
Date: 2012-05-03 04:24:38
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/29/12 9:27 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Maybe I can help with that by describing what the Wisconsin court
> system does for circuit court data.

Thanks for the write-up, it was insightful.

One thing I wanted to mention is that non-binary replication has an added advantage over binary from a DR standpoint: if corruption occurs on a master it is more likely to make it into your replicas thanks to full page writes. You might want to consider that depending on how sensitive your data is.
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell)               

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2012-05-03 05:58:15
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-03 04:16:34
Subject: Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group