| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Temporary tables under hot standby |
| Date: | 2012-05-01 20:12:20 |
| Message-ID: | 4FA043A4.5010608@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/25/12 6:16 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> The way standard-like temporary tables work is exactly why I assume
>> > Noah proposes to implement them: because they work nicely with HS.
> Well, following a standard that no other major DBMS has followed is
> not great, especially if it leads to a non-useful feature.
Actually, Oracle's temp tables are standard-compliant. You must explicitly define them via DDL and they remain in the catalog.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-05-01 20:14:02 | Re: proposal: additional error fields |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-01 20:09:17 | Re: proposal: additional error fields |