Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory

From: Toby Corkindale <toby(dot)corkindale(at)strategicdata(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory
Date: 2012-04-26 07:16:45
Message-ID: 4F98F65D.1020101@strategicdata.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 26/04/12 16:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Toby Corkindale<toby(dot)corkindale(at)strategicdata(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> On 26/04/12 15:30, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, is the update target an inheritance tree?
>
>> The target is the parent table of a bunch of partitions.
>
> How many would "a bunch" be, exactly? I'm fairly sure that the complex
> view would get re-planned for each target table ...

The table being updated (line) has 57 child tables.

-Toby

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Toby Corkindale 2012-04-26 07:19:43 Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-04-26 06:58:06 Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory