| From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus |
| Date: | 2012-04-15 09:14:38 |
| Message-ID: | 4F8A917E.4020305@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
2012-04-14 18:15 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta:
> On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule<pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> It has a lot of sense. Without it, it's very difficult to do logical
>>>> replication on a table with no primary key.
>>>>
>>>> (Whether or not people should create such tables in the first place
>>>> is, of course, beside the point.)
>>> I am not against to functionality - I am against just to syntax DELETE
>>> FROM tab LIMIT x
>>>
>>> because is it ambiguous what means: DELETE FROM tab RETURNING * LIMIT x
>> What's ambiguous about that?
> I suppose one could wonder whether the LIMIT applies to the deleting or
> just the returning.
Ambigous only in this order. LIMIT x RETURNING * wouldn't be.
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig& Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-04-15 09:20:42 | Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-14 21:48:31 | Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-04-15 09:20:42 | Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2012-04-15 09:11:20 | Re: Clobbered parameter names via DECLARE in PL/PgSQL |