Re: patch for parallel pg_dump

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2012-03-29 03:43:42
Message-ID: 4F73DA6E.5080300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/28/2012 09:12 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> But your patch hasn't got rid of them, and so it's declared twice. There is
>> no pgpipe.h, BTW, it's declared in port.h. If VC2005 doesn't complain about
>> the double declaration then that's a bug in the compiler, IMNSHO. Doesn't it
>> even issue a warning? I no longer use VC2005 for anything, BTW, I use VC2008
>> or later.
> I agree, the compiler should have found it, but no, I don't even get a
> warning. I just verified it and when I add a #error right after the
> prototypes in port.h then it hits the #error on every file, so it
> definitely sees both prototypes and doesn't complain... cl.exe is
> running with /W3.
>
> src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c
>> Anyway, ISTM the best thing is just for us to get rid of pgpipe without
>> further ado. I'll try to get a patch together for that.
> Thanks.

OK, I have committed this. Following that, you need to add a couple of
macros for pipewrite to parallel.c. There's also a missing cast in the
call to beginthreadex().

I'll continue testing tomorrow.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2012-03-29 04:43:49 Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-29 02:45:00 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_test_timing utility, to measure clock monotonicity and timing