Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSD and RAID

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSD and RAID
Date: 2012-03-06 09:34:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 2012-03-06 09:34, Andrea Suisani wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 09:17 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
>> PS: we applied the same philosophy (different brands) also to 
>> motherboards, io controllers and memory, but after testing, we liked 
>> one IO controllers software so much more than the other so we chose 
>> to have only one. Also stream memory performance of one motherboard 
>> showed a significant performance
>> regression in the higher thread counts that we decided to go for the 
>> other brand for all servers.
> care to share motherboard winning model?
> thanks
> Andrea

On is a graph of three systems, made with 
the multi stream scaling (average of 10 tests if I remember correctly) test.

The red and blue are 2 X 12 core opteron 6168 systems with 64 GB DDR3 
1333MHz in 8GB dimms

Red is a Tyan S8230
Blue is a Supermicro H8DGI-G

We tried a lot of things to rule out motherboards, such as swap memory 
of both systems, ensure BIOS settings are similar (e.g. ECC mode), 
update to latest BIOS where possible, but none of those settings 
improved the memory performance drop. Both systems were installed with 
kickstarted Centos 6.2, so also no kernel setting differences there..


Yeb Havinga
Mastering Medical Data

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Andrea SuisaniDate: 2012-03-06 09:56:22
Subject: Re: SSD and RAID
Previous:From: Andrea SuisaniDate: 2012-03-06 08:34:15
Subject: Re: SSD and RAID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group