Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: SSD and RAID
Date: 2012-03-05 22:37:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Where I work we are starting to look at using SSDs for database server 
storage. Despite the higher per unit cost it is quite attractive to 
replace 6-8 SAS drives in RAID 10 by a pair of SSD in RAID 1 that will 
probably perform better and use less power.

Which brings up the question of should it be a pair in RAID 1 or just a 
singe drive? Traditionally this would have been a no brainer "Of course 
you want RAID 1 or RAID 10"! However our experience with SSD failure 
modes points to firmware bugs as primary source of trouble - and these 
are likely to impact both drives (nearly) simultaneously in a RAID 1 
configuration. Also the other major issue to watch - flash write limit 
exhaustion - is also likely to hit at the same time for a pair of drives 
in RAID 1.

One option to get around the simultaneous firmware failure is to be to 
get 2 *similar* drives from different manufactures (e.g OCZ Vertex 32 
and Intel 520 - both Sandforce but different firmware setup). However 
using different manufacturers drives is a pest (e.g different smart 
codes maintained and/or different meanings for the same codes)

What are other folks who are using SSDs doing?




pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tomas VondraDate: 2012-03-05 23:03:58
Subject: Re: SSD and RAID
Previous:From: Rory Campbell-LangeDate: 2012-03-05 21:59:00
Subject: Re: Advice sought : new database server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group