Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC
Date: 2012-02-29 14:59:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 23.02.2012 01:36, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:32 -0500, Dan Ports wrote:
>>> Hmm, it occurs to me if we have to abort a transaction due to
>>> serialization failure involving a prepared transaction, we might
>>> want to include the prepared transaction's gid in the errdetail.
>> I like this idea.
> +1. Anyone want to put together a patch?
Unless Dan claims it before I start the work, I'll do it.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-02-29 15:01:37
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2012-02-29 14:40:11
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group