Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: swapcache-style cache?

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de
Subject: Re: swapcache-style cache?
Date: 2012-02-28 03:30:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 02/27/2012 03:24 PM, Jan Lentfer wrote:
> And, yes.. it does effect pgsql performance on read loads seriously.
> See BSD Mag 5/2011
> and

Caching on the read-only pgbench is a well defined workload at this 
point.  If your database fits in RAM, once it's all in there additional 
caching doesn't help.  If the database is much larger than the cache, 
the cache barely helps there too; you'll still be facing mostly cache 
misses.  The case in the middle is the one where an additional layer of 
cache really helps.  Read-heavy systems where the working set of the 
database is larger than RAM, but not significantly larger than the extra 
cache, will benefit the most here.

Your test results are in that zone, with 2GB RAM < 5.6GB database < 16GB 
cache.  Having a database slightly larger than physical RAM is where the 
big win with SSD normally shows up at.  Moving the whole database from a 
regular drive to SSD might get as much as a 5X speedup, you're seeing a 
3X to 4X one with the swap cache in the middle.

Having the OS manage all that, to keep the most relevant data on the 
SSD, is a cool feature.  Some systems won't benefit at all though, and 
your test is showing near the best case possible for this feature.  As 
you should, of course.

Anyway, the question upthread was whether the database should manage 
something like this on its own.  I suggested it could be done perfectly 
fine by the OS, without any database knowledge of what is going on. 
Your results seem to validate that idea.

Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rob WultschDate: 2012-02-28 03:52:39
Subject: Re: swapcache-style cache?
Previous:From: Lucky HaryadiDate: 2012-02-28 03:05:52
Subject: Hot Standby Failover Scenario

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group