Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2012-02-14 09:09:54
Message-ID: 4F3A24E2.3060009@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2012/02/14 15:15), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> Good catch, thanks. I'll revise pgsql_fdw tests little more.

Here are the updated patches. In addition to Fujita-san's comment, I
moved DROP OPERATOR statements to clean up section of test script.

Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada

Attachment Content-Type Size
fdw_helper_v5.patch text/plain 12.8 KB
pgsql_fdw_v9.patch text/plain 106.7 KB
pgsql_fdw_pushdown_v5.patch text/plain 36.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2012-02-14 09:44:51 Re: Memory usage during sorting
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2012-02-14 08:40:48 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server