Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2012-02-14 06:15:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2012/02/13 20:50), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> The patches have been applied, but role-related regression tests failed
> in my environment.  I fixed it in a similar fashion of
> /src/test/regress/sql/foreign_data.sql.  Please find attached a updated
> patch for the regression tests.

Good catch, thanks.  I'll revise pgsql_fdw tests little more.

> BTW, What do you think about this?

I'm sorry that I've left the thread unfinished...  I've given up to
propose Join-push-down of foreign tables for 9.2, because it will take a
while to achieve general semantics mapping for join push-down and WHERE
clause push-down.  For 9.2, I'm proposing pgsql_fdw which has WHERE
clause push-down for built-in elements which are free from collation.
I'd like to go back to that item after 9.2 development enters beta or
RC, hopefully :)

Shigeru Hanada

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2012-02-14 07:04:26
Subject: Re: Measuring relation free space
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-02-14 03:44:17
Subject: Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group