| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,<yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <jbrindle(at)tresys(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label |
| Date: | 2012-02-04 19:24:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4F2D31910200002500044DBF@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> What I was concerned about was the case where GUC is trying to
> re-establish an old value during transaction rollback. For example,
> assume we are superuser to start with, and we do
>
> begin;
> set role unprivileged_user;
> ...
> rollback;
>
> The rollback needs to transition the role setting back to
> superuser.
Sorry for missing the point. Yeah, I totally agree with that.
> And yeah, I agree it's a bug that you can do what Kevin's example
> shows.
I'll look at it and see if I can pull together a patch.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bridget Frey | 2012-02-04 19:52:09 | Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-02-04 19:13:45 | Re: some longer, larger pgbench tests with various performance-related patches |