Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,<yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <jbrindle(at)tresys(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label
Date: 2012-02-04 19:24:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane  wrote:
> What I was concerned about was the case where GUC is trying to
> re-establish an old value during transaction rollback. For example,
> assume we are superuser to start with, and we do
>     begin;
>     set role unprivileged_user;
>     ...
>     rollback;
> The rollback needs to transition the role setting back to
> superuser.
Sorry for missing the point.  Yeah, I totally agree with that.
> And yeah, I agree it's a bug that you can do what Kevin's example
> shows.
I'll look at it and see if I can pull together a patch.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bridget FreyDate: 2012-02-04 19:52:09
Subject: Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple
Previous:From: Jeff JanesDate: 2012-02-04 19:13:45
Subject: Re: some longer, larger pgbench tests with various performance-related patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group