| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j # |
| Date: | 2012-01-17 13:55:47 |
| Message-ID: | 4F157DE3.2070801@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/17/2012 07:33 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Andres Freund<andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 01:18:53 PM Susanne Ebrecht wrote:
>>> I would prefer to have an option that the user is able to tell on how much
>>> cores it should be shared. Something like --share-cores=N.
>> Uhm. -j # does exactly that or am I missing your point?
>>
> not really.
>
> if you have 12 cores and you say -j 12 you would have 1 process per
> core, with Susanne's suggestion, AFAIUI, you can say -j 12
> --shared-cores=6... so you would only use 6 cores of the 12 and have 2
> processes per core
>
That looks messy. IMNSHO it should work just like pg_restore's -j.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-01-17 14:04:47 | Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j # |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-01-17 13:45:37 | Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths |