Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.
Date: 2012-01-06 16:13:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers

On 01/06/2012 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie ene 06 10:34:30 -0300 2012:
>> And yes, we should possibly add a regression test or two. Of course, we can't use the cause of the original complaint ($^V) in them, though.
> Why not?  You obviously can't need output it verbatim, but you could
> compare it with a different function that returns $^V stringified by a
> different mechanism.

not sure exactly how to in such a way that exercises this code, but feel 
free to suggest something ;-)



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-06 16:37:25
Subject: Re: Poorly thought out code in vacuum
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-01-06 16:05:21
Subject: Re: CLOG contention

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-01-06 18:05:09
Subject: pgsql: Fix pg_restore's direct-to-database mode for INSERT-styletable
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-01-06 15:49:26
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group