On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am for ECMA datestyle
> it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
> Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
> interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the
> usage of this feature is minimal and there is risk for less advanced
> users - so ECMA datestyle is very adequate solution.
i don't particularly need anything other than ECMA datestyle - i was
just under the impression that a more generic solution was preferred.
so, ECMA is enough to stop me from making any more noise about this.
pavel, is there a way i can use this currently? if not, would it take
much effort to make this public?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2011-12-06 20:53:05|
|Subject: Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-12-06 20:25:11|
|Subject: Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST |