| From: | ben hockey <neonstalwart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
| Date: | 2011-12-06 20:26:12 |
| Message-ID: | 4EDE7A64.80209@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> I am for ECMA datestyle
>
> it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
>
> Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
> interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the
> usage of this feature is minimal and there is risk for less advanced
> users - so ECMA datestyle is very adequate solution.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
i don't particularly need anything other than ECMA datestyle - i was
just under the impression that a more generic solution was preferred.
so, ECMA is enough to stop me from making any more noise about this.
pavel, is there a way i can use this currently? if not, would it take
much effort to make this public?
thanks,
ben...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-12-06 20:53:05 | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-12-06 20:25:11 | Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST |