Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch for type privileges

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch for type privileges
Date: 2011-12-01 13:37:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2011-11-29 18:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-11-29 at 07:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On mån, 2011-11-28 at 11:41 +0100, Yeb Havinga wrote:
>>> On 2011-11-15 21:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> Patch attached.
>>> I cannot get the patch to apply, this is the output of patch -p1
>>> --dry-run on HEAD.
>> I need to remerge it against concurrent range type activity.
> New patch attached.

I'm looking at your patch. One thing that puzzled me for a while was 
that I could not restrict access to base types (either built-in or user 
defined). Is this intentional?

Yeb Havinga

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-12-01 13:56:59
Subject: Re: Why so few built-in range types?
Previous:From: Alexander KorotkovDate: 2011-12-01 13:34:58
Subject: Re: WIP: index support for regexp search

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group