Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Materialized views

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: Materialized views
Date: 2011-11-18 22:06:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> I'm considering submitting a proposal to management that I be
> assigned to work on a declarative implementation in PostgreSQL to
> allow speedier application development of software needing
> materialized views.
Thanks to all who provided feedback and support in response to my
Based on the feedback here and off-list, I did submit a proposal. 
It was just approved by the appropriate steering committee
(consisting of our CIO, the Director of State Courts, District Court
Administrators, Judges, Clerks of Court, and other stake-holders) as
a low-priority project.  That means that I expect I'll have the time
to get a patch together in time for 9.3, but the times at which the
decks will be clear of other assignments to allow work on this will
not be very predictable.  I'll probably be on-again, off-again
throughout the year.  I apologize in advance for the fact that the
times when I will be able to work on it might not fit well with the
release cycle or CFs, but I kinda have to take what I can get in
that regard.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2011-11-18 22:08:18
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2011-11-18 21:45:31
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace a long chain of if's in eval_const_expressions_mutator by a switch()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group