On 09/11/2011 10:32 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
>>> Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups
>> This turns out to be a one-liner.
> I really don't know that I agree with removing this, to be honest.. I
> haven't got time at the moment to really discuss it, but at the very
> least, not being able to 'set role' to any user when postgres would be
> REALLY annoying..
It's NOT changing that. All this affects is how +groupname is treated in
pg_hba.conf, i.e. do we treat every superuser there as being a member of
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-09-12 03:43:47|
|Subject: Re: psql additions|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-09-12 03:27:40|
|Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?|