Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large C files

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large C files
Date: 2011-09-08 21:59:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon, Robert, Bruce, Tom,

>>>> >>> Say what?  When else would you have us do it?
>> >
>>> >> When else would you have us develop?
>> >
>> > In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development.  I find the
>> > distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
>> > make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety.  Any
>> > significant development change carries a risk of breakage.
> You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this.
> That doesn't make it worthwhile or sensible though.

The above really seems like a non-argument over trivial wording of
stuff.  Can we please give each other the benefit of the doubt and not
read objectionable content into offhand comments?

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris RedekopDate: 2011-09-08 22:33:39
Subject: Re: pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Previous:From: Ants AasmaDate: 2011-09-08 21:45:28
Subject: Re: concurrent snapshots

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group