Simon, Robert, Bruce, Tom,
>>>> >>> Say what? When else would you have us do it?
>>> >> When else would you have us develop?
>> > In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. I find the
>> > distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
>> > make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. Any
>> > significant development change carries a risk of breakage.
> You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this.
> That doesn't make it worthwhile or sensible though.
The above really seems like a non-argument over trivial wording of
stuff. Can we please give each other the benefit of the doubt and not
read objectionable content into offhand comments?
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Chris Redekop||Date: 2011-09-08 22:33:39|
|Subject: Re: pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp|
|Previous:||From: Ants Aasma||Date: 2011-09-08 21:45:28|
|Subject: Re: concurrent snapshots|