| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Large C files |
| Date: | 2011-09-08 21:59:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4E693AD1.3050901@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon, Robert, Bruce, Tom,
>>>> >>> Say what? When else would you have us do it?
>> >
>>> >> When else would you have us develop?
>> >
>> > In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. I find the
>> > distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
>> > make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. Any
>> > significant development change carries a risk of breakage.
> You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this.
>
> That doesn't make it worthwhile or sensible though.
The above really seems like a non-argument over trivial wording of
stuff. Can we please give each other the benefit of the doubt and not
read objectionable content into offhand comments?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Redekop | 2011-09-08 22:33:39 | Re: pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp |
| Previous Message | Ants Aasma | 2011-09-08 21:45:28 | Re: concurrent snapshots |