Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)
Date: 2011-08-02 15:59:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 02.08.2011 15:18, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>  wrote:
>> On 02.08.2011 14:36, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Actually I think we can append the new information to the end of the page
>> split record, so that an old version server can read WAL generated by new
>> version, too.
> Not sure how that would work. Lengths, CRCs?
> Or do you mean we will support 2 versions, have them both called the
> same thing, just resolve which is which by the record length. Don't
> like that.

Here's a patch to do what I meant. The new fields are stored at the very 
end of the WAL record, and you check the length to see if they're there 
or not. The nice thing about this is that it's compatible in both 

   Heikki Linnakangas

Attachment: gist-split-hotstandby-90.patch
Description: text/x-diff (2.3 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Phil SorberDate: 2011-08-02 16:55:24
Subject: Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-08-02 15:54:24
Subject: Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group