Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
Date: 2011-06-08 11:30:20
Message-ID: 4DEF5D4C.9070401@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(sorry for repeatedly replying to self. I'll go for a coffee after this...)

On 08.06.2011 14:18, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Committed after adjusting that comment. I did a lot of other cosmetic
> changes too, please double-check that I didn't screw up anything.

Also, it would be nice to have some regression tests for this. I don't
think any of the existing tests exercise these new functions (except for
the fast-exit, which isn't very interesting).

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-08 12:44:53 Re: WALInsertLock contention
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-06-08 11:26:16 Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock