> Perhaps we can outline Major Features and Innovations separately. This
> release is notable for the number of genuinely new ideas implemented,
> so that's worth making something of even if the advanced features
> themselves need a little more explanation. Or Perhaps have
> "Innovations" as a major feature and then a comma list of the names of
Yeah, that sounds like the way to go.
So for Innovations, we'd have SSI, SE/Postgres, KNN-GiST, and wCTE, no?
Or does someone else have wCTEs? I vaguely remember something about
SQL Server ...
There's also another obvious grouping: Extensibility. This would
include both Extensions and SQL/MED.
So we could have:
I like that, it means we can list everything but without having a long
laundry list which nobody will read.
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-04-03 08:32:27|
|Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1|
|Previous:||From: Adrian Klaver||Date: 2011-04-02 19:08:38|
|Subject: Re: Theme for release|