Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06:30AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> The only thing I've been on the fence about is whether it
>> makes more sense to allocate it all up front or to continue to
>> incremental allocation but set a hard limit on the number of
>> allocated for each shared memory HTAB. Is there a performance-
>> related reason to choose one path or the other?
> Seems like it would be marginally better to allocate it up front --
> you don't have the cost of having to split buckets later as it
The attached patch should cover that.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2011-03-31 18:31:37|
|Subject: Re: SSI bug?|
|Previous:||From: Steve Crawford||Date: 2011-03-31 18:16:44|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Date conversion using day of week|