Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another swing at JSON

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON
Date: 2011-03-30 16:38:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/30/2011 12:29 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>  writes:
>> I think we're pretty much down to only fixing bugs now, for 9.1, and this
>> isn't a bug, however inconvenient it might be.
> It's not just inconvenient, it's setting a bad example for people to
> work on their own extensions.  It's more than unfortunate.  I will
> prepare a doc patch, but copying from contrib is the usual way to go
> creating your own extension, right?

None of that makes it a bug.

I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib 
Makefiles telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this 
stage of the cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an 
idea from the top of my head.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2011-03-30 16:43:36
Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2011-03-30 16:29:32
Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group