| From: | Rainer Pruy <Rainer(dot)Pruy(at)Acrys(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) |
| Date: | 2011-03-28 14:31:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4D909BC7.9050502@acrys.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I digged into my sent folder,
and the outgoing message already dat the false headers.
So probably my MUA (thunderbird) got confused on something and caused
that blunder.
Sorry for that
Rainer
Am 28.03.2011 16:05, schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> Rainer, any idea? Please see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D906269.6060109@commandprompt.com
>
>
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 11:03:16 -0300 2011:
>> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 07:26:49 -0300 2011:
>>> Likely "too large" is more an issue related to available resources than
>>> of absolute figure.
>>>
>>> On a penta byte of free storage I would not mind allocating some teras
>>> with extending a (large) table.
>>> If I'm left with some MB only, I'd be concerned for sure.
>> ...
>>
>> Does anybody have an idea just W-T-F happened here? I did NOT send the
>> above email (as evidenced by it being signed by "Rainer"). I notice it
>> even has a "@commandprompt.com" message-id. Should I start signing my
>> email?
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Burladyan | 2011-03-28 18:04:25 | Re: BUG #5950: backend terminating after altering table |
| Previous Message | Rainer Pruy | 2011-03-28 14:28:54 | Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) |