| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
| Date: | 2011-03-18 19:41:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4D83B54C.2030708@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 03/18/2011 08:29 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> We could do that easily enough, actually, if we wished.
>
> Do we wish?
I personally don't see any problem letting a standby show a snapshot
before the master. I'd consider it unneeded network traffic. But then
again, I'm completely biased.
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2011-03-18 21:08:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-03-18 19:34:18 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-03-18 20:51:11 | Re: SSI bug? |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-03-18 19:34:18 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |