Re: SSI bug?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI bug?
Date: 2011-03-18 21:57:32
Message-ID: 4D838EFC020000250003BB12@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning
> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its
> max_size when it was created.

I think this does it.

If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the
SSI patch. Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should
I add it to the first 9.2 CF?

-Kevin

Attachment Content-Type Size
htab-excess-warning.patch text/plain 2.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-18 22:41:35 pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address.
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-03-18 21:48:33 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.