Re: Top five challenges

From: silly sad <sad(at)bestmx(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Top five challenges
Date: 2011-03-03 11:01:21
Message-ID: 4D6F7501.30904@bestmx.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On 03/02/11 17:07, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from sad's message of mié mar 02 10:23:53 -0300 2011:
>> On Mar 2 2011, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>>>> 3. To make TIMESTAMPTZ useful by introducing proper type cast
>>>> TIMESTAMPTZ to TIMESTAMP
>>>
>>> Why are you using Timestamp-no-tz at all? I was thinking we should
>>> change the default ...
>>
>> Why did u introduced it?
>
> The standard requires the current behavior. It's not going to change.
> It changed in 7.1 or so.
>

does standard require to have TWO DIFFERENT EPOCHS?

SELECT 'epoch'::TIMESTAMPTZ, 'epoch'::TIMESTAMP;

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-03-03 17:58:44 Re: Top five challenges
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-03-02 16:36:00 Re: Top five challenges

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-03-03 17:58:44 Re: Top five challenges
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-03-02 16:36:00 Re: Top five challenges