Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2011-02-23 19:49:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2. Synchronous replication.  Splitting up this patch has allowed some
> This has gotten a bunch of review, on several different threads.  I
> assume Simon will publish an update when he gets back to his
> keyboard...

That was the idea.  If anyone has any serious concerns about the current 
patch, please don't hold off just because you know Simon is away for a 
bit.  We've been trying to keep that from impacting community progress 
too badly this week.

On top of 4 listed reviewers I know Dan Farina is poking at the last 
update, so we may see one more larger report on top of what's already 
shown up.  And Jaime keeps kicking the tires too.  What Simon was hoping 
is that a week of others looking at this would produce enough feedback 
that it might be possible to sweep the remaining issues up soon after 
he's back.  It looks to me like that's about when everything else that's 
still open will probably settle too.

Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-23 20:03:23
Subject: Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-02-23 19:48:57
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group