Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Support for Slony 2.0?

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
Date: 2011-01-23 22:25:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Le 22/01/2011 15:46, Peter Geoghegan a écrit :
> On 20 January 2011 21:28, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> A wizard as you suggest has been on my "if only i had the time and
>> energy" todo list for a few years :-)
> It's something that I'd like to take a look at, once we finish wx 2.9
> support. As I think you'll agree, it's important that the end result
> is a Slonik script rather than a series of calls to bare metal
> functions from within PgAdmin.

Actually, I don't. If people are that interested in a Slonik script,
they would learn the Slonik language if they want to do a good job. The
UI in pgAdmin is a way to skip that part, and this is why it's
interesting to keep it.

Anyway, I'm not opposed to add this wizard if we still keep the UI we
already have.


In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-01-24 08:41:32
Subject: Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-01-23 22:21:44
Subject: Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group