Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Migrating to Postgresql and new hardware

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Lars <la(at)unifaun(dot)com>, mark <dvlhntr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Migrating to Postgresql and new hardware
Date: 2011-01-20 14:48:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 1/19/2011 6:42 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 05:09 PM, Lars wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply!
>>> As others have mentioned, how are you going to be doing your "shards"?
>> Hmm... shards might not have been a good word to describe it. I'll
>> paste what I wrote in another reply:
>> I used sharding as an expression for partitioning data into several
>> databases.
> "sharding" or "shards" is pretty much the standard way that setup is
> described. It doesn't come up on the Pg list a lot as most people doing
> web-oriented horizontally scaled apps use MySQL or fashionable non-SQL
> databases, but it's pretty well known in wider circles.
> --
> Craig Ringer

Or... PG is just so good we've never had to use more than one database 
server!  :-)


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-20 15:25:39
Subject: Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-20 14:19:00
Subject: Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group