| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |
| Date: | 2011-01-19 21:37:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4D37599D.4060608@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 19/01/2011 22:26, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to know if we still want to support Slony. I was working on
>> fixing an issue with our support of Slony till I finally understood we
>> don't have any support of Slony 2.0.
>
> That's not correct - it certainly was working as Sachin made changes
> to support 2.0, eg:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=0edc75af62a223d5a015c81de7d1ebeea3d7ccd3
>
Oops, yeah, you're right. Sorry. So we have at least two bugs on 2.0.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-19 22:37:11 | pgAdmin III commit: Display the message only when we're connected |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-19 21:26:51 | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |