Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pl/python refactoring

From: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/python refactoring
Date: 2011-01-02 11:41:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/01/11 13:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-01-01 at 13:24 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 01/01/11 01:00, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On tor, 2010-12-23 at 14:41 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>>> It does some architectural changes to PL/Python that make it easier to
>>>> implement other features, like for instance a validator function. The
>>>> full list of changes in the patch is:
>>> I would review this and the following patches, but I'd really prefer it
>>> if you could split this particular patch into about 11 single-purpose
>>> patches.  I think most of the changes here are not interrelated.
>> OK, I'll split this patch into even smaller chunks.
> Thanks.  Just attach them all to a single mail message.  Don't create
> new CF entries or something.

Here they are. There are 16 patches in total. They amount to what's
currently in my refactor branch (and almost to what I've sent as the
complete refactor patch, while doing the splitting I discovered a few
useless hunks that I've discarded).


Attachment: 0001-Use-HTABs-instead-of-Python-dictionary-objects-to-ca.patch
Description: text/x-patch (0 bytes)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2011-01-02 11:43:13
Subject: Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2011-01-02 10:59:32
Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group