Re: pl/python refactoring

From: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/python refactoring
Date: 2011-01-02 11:41:24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/01/11 13:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-01-01 at 13:24 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 01/01/11 01:00, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On tor, 2010-12-23 at 14:41 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>>> It does some architectural changes to PL/Python that make it easier to
>>>> implement other features, like for instance a validator function. The
>>>> full list of changes in the patch is:
>>> I would review this and the following patches, but I'd really prefer it
>>> if you could split this particular patch into about 11 single-purpose
>>> patches. I think most of the changes here are not interrelated.
>> OK, I'll split this patch into even smaller chunks.
> Thanks. Just attach them all to a single mail message. Don't create
> new CF entries or something.

Here they are. There are 16 patches in total. They amount to what's
currently in my refactor branch (and almost to what I've sent as the
complete refactor patch, while doing the splitting I discovered a few
useless hunks that I've discarded).


Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Use-HTABs-instead-of-Python-dictionary-objects-to-ca.patch text/x-patch 0 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-01-02 11:43:13 Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2011-01-02 10:59:32 Re: Sync Rep Design