| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Royce Ausburn <royce(at)inomial(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CPU bound |
| Date: | 2010-12-13 18:59:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4D066D0E.6070405@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 12/12/10 6:43 PM, Royce Ausburn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I notice that when restoring a DB on a laptop with an SDD, typically postgres is maxing out a CPU - even during a COPY. I wonder, what is postgres usually doing with the CPU? I would have thought the disk would usually be the bottleneck in the DB, but occasionally it's not. We're embarking on a new DB server project and it'd be helpful to understand where the CPU is likely to be the bottleneck.
That's pretty normal; as soon as you get decent disk, especially
something like an SSD with a RAM cache, you become CPU-bound. COPY does
a LOT of parsing and data manipulation. Index building, of course, is
almost pure CPU if you have a decent amount of RAM available.
If you're restoring from a pg_dump file, and have several cores
available, I suggest using parallel pg_restore.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benjamin Krajmalnik | 2010-12-13 20:45:10 | Re: Hardware recommendations |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-12-13 11:10:37 | Re: CPU bound |