On 12/13/2010 12:54 AM, Glen Knowles wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
> > What are the values of _S_IREAD and _S_IWRITE, anyway? I'm still
> > wondering how come the previous coding with hardwired constants
> > behaved correctly.
> Still curious about this.
> FWIW, _S_IREAD and _S_IWRITE are defined by Visual Studio C++ 2008 in
> sys/stat.h as 0x0100 and 0x0080 respectively.
Mingw values are the same.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-13 17:01:10|
|Subject: Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0 |
|Previous:||From: Hitoshi Harada||Date: 2010-12-13 16:33:28|
|Subject: Re: SQL/MED - core functionality|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-12-13 17:35:28|
|Subject: pgsql: Generalize concept of temporary relations to "relationpersisten|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-12-13 15:20:36|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Self review of previous patch. Fix
assumption that xmax >= xmin.|