Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net" <w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net>
Subject: Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
Date: 2010-12-01 14:51:12
Message-ID: 4CF660E0.3050001@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2010-12-01 15:27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> FK's cannot refer to rows in inheritance childs. With some changes in
>> LockRows, together with removing the ONLY keyword in ri_trigger.c, it
>> was possible to refer to the rows in child relations. (WIP patch attached)
>> Though it passes simple tests, it is far from complete.
> Indeed. This isn't even worth the time to review, unless you have a
> proposal for fixing the unique-index-across-multiple-tables problem.
That was in the part that you chose to not quote.

regards,
Yeb Havinga

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-01 14:51:20 Re: KNNGIST next step: adjusting indexAM API
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-01 14:41:08 Re: Proposal: First step towards Intelligent, integrateddatabase