Re: foreign keys for array/period contains relationships

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: foreign keys for array/period contains relationships
Date: 2010-10-27 20:53:37
Message-ID: 4CC89151.6040204@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/26/10 11:53 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Intuitively, I would expect all 1's to be replaced by 6's in all arrays.
> But I can now see why you would be hesitant to try to support that.

If people want cascading update to work, they shouldn't be denormalizing.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-27 21:01:17 Re: Simplifying replication
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-27 20:42:42 Re: max_wal_senders must die