Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Composite Types and Function Parameters

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg <grigorey(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Composite Types and Function Parameters
Date: 2010-10-26 01:32:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/25/2010 07:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, that objection doesn't hold for plperl or pltcl (and likely
> not plpython, though I don't know that language enough to be sure).
> So it would be a reasonable feature request to teach those PLs to
> accept "record" parameters.  I think the fact that they don't stems
> mostly from nobody having revisited their design since the
> infrastructure that supports record_out was created.

That seems like a good idea. I'll look at it for plperl.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-26 01:45:23
Subject: Re: security hook on authorization
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-26 01:31:04
Subject: Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group