On 10/24/2010 07:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 10/24/2010 06:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm not certain that plperl is actually correct to do it that way,
>>> but that's the basic idea.
>> Why do we need the is_trigger flag at all for the plperl hash key? At
>> first glance it strikes me as unnecessary.
> We might not. Does the presence or absence of the $_TD hash reference
> have any impact on what we cache, or what Perl might cache internally?
For both trigger and non-trigger functions, we compile this ahead of the
user-set function code:
our $_TD; local $_TD=shift;
Non-trigger functions get passed "undef" to correspond to this invisible
argument, while trigger functions get passed the hashref that the
trigger calling code has set up.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-10-25 00:55:30|
|Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-10-25 00:12:46|
|Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums |