|From:||Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>|
|Subject:||Re: ECPG FETCH readahead|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Robert Haas írta:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04:30PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> Is there a reason not to enable it by default? I'm a bit worried
>>> that it will receive no testing if it's not always on.
>> Yes, there is a reason, namely that you don't need it in native mode at all.
>> ECPG can read as many records as you want in one go, something ESQL/C
>> apparently cannot do. This patch is a workaround for that restriction. I still
>> do not really see that this feature gives us an advantage in native mode
> So, who has the next action on this patch? Does Zoltan need to revise
> it, or does Michael need to review it, or where are we?
Michael reviewed it shortly in private and I need to send
a new revision anyway, regardless of his comments.
I will refresh it ASAP.
|Next Message||Dimitri Fontaine||2010-10-14 10:01:12||Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments|
|Previous Message||Itagaki Takahiro||2010-10-14 08:36:49||Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress|