| From: | David Newall <postgresql(at)davidnewall(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |
| Date: | 2010-10-14 06:52:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4CB6A8A9.6010208@davidnewall.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 14/10/10 12:14, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Which solution is better? Or, another idea?
>
This does seem to be an new bug in previously working code. While any
solution that fixes the problem is good, it might pay to look the code
that worked before. As reported, it worked for ecpg (PostgreSQL 8.3.8)
4.4.1.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-10-14 08:36:49 | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-10-14 01:44:50 | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-10-14 06:59:23 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Previous Message | Pavel Golub | 2010-10-14 06:29:25 | Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass? |