Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege
Date: 2010-10-07 00:41:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2010/10/07 2:05), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Another thing that could raise eyebrows is that I chose to remove the
>>> "missing_ok" argument from get_role_oid_or_public, so it's not a perfect
>>> mirror of it.  None of the current callers need it, but perhaps people
>>> would like these functions to be consistent.
>> Tom Lane suggested to add missing_ok argument, although it is not a must-
>> requirement.
> Actually I think he suggested the opposite.
Ahh, I understood his suggestion as literal.

Well, I'd like to mark this patch as 'ready for committer'.

KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-07 00:44:45
Subject: Re: todo point: plpgsql - scrollable cursors are supported
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-07 00:39:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group