From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Dekany <ddekany(at)freemail(dot)hu> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Upgrade to 9 questions |
Date: | 2010-10-02 08:59:24 |
Message-ID: | 4CA6F46C.5020508@postnewspapers.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 2/10/2010 4:30 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Saturday, October 2, 2010, 9:24:42 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> On 2/10/2010 2:40 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Friday, October 1, 2010, 7:39:31 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Bremer, Gerd"<gerd(dot)bremer(at)coremedia(dot)com> wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> I suspect that if you pull official jars from the JDBC download
>>>> page, nobody will find anything amiss if you keep Maven central
>>>> current.
>>>
>>> Although if someone wants to contribute for this purpose, it makes
>>> much more sense to add Maven deployment to the Ant(?) script that is
>>> used for making the releases. Then whoever does the release does the
>>> release on Maven as well. It's safer and causes less delay.
>>
>> http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks/index.html
>
> Or, a more relevant page:
> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Sonatype+OSS+Maven+Repository+Usage+Guide
>
> (AFAIR nowadays you will need a middleman, like sonatype.org for
> example. The old way of doing this, which was that the Maven central
> repo periodically rsync-ed itself with the public repo on your Web
> server is now deprecated.)
Aah, I didn't realize Sonatype were taking such a big role these days
with Nexus. Good - they seem to be pushing for quality control,
consistency, and at least some degree of security in their repository
management.
Thanks for the link.
--
Craig Ringer
Tech-related writing at http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | stagirus | 2010-10-02 21:03:28 | Re: [BUGS] Mapping Hibernate boolean to smallint(Postgresql) |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-10-02 08:58:34 | Re: Upgrade to 9 questions |