| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2010-08-19 17:43:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4C6D6D55.9020607@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> Beta testers are one thing; large numbers of production users are
> something else again. I believe it's better tested this time than it
> was last time around, but I wouldn't be prepared to bet against us
> finding more bugs.
I'm certain that we'll find more bugs. More or less indefinitely, in
fact; pg_upgrade is aiming at a moving target. However, I do have
confidence that it now works for 80-90% of users out of the box, which
is a considerable improvement over a year ago.
For that matter, I'm certain that within the next year we'll find at
least one bug in pg_dump/pg_restore. Nothing is bug-free; the bugs just
occur with less frequency.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-23 12:56:34 | Example indenting |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-19 01:27:54 | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |