Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: About our GSoC projects

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects
Date: 2010-08-18 08:39:06
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Le 18/08/2010 10:32, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:25, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
>>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
>>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
>>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
>>> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
>> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
> That really depends on the workflow. It can be pretty darn efficient,
> particularly if you work with semi-working features.
> But it does take a different mindset - if you work on it with the
> traditional mindset, it's indeed a huge waste of time.

I'm not against having a new mindset, but that will take some time. I
can probably try this with Luis. I have to talk with him about it.


In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-08-18 08:48:08
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-08-18 08:37:20
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group