ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

From: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
Date: 2010-07-22 13:29:52
Message-ID: 4C4847D0.9030001@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general

Hi all,

I'm looking into some ecpg part of the official manual,
and I have found some strange things.

I'm now investigating SQLCODE and SQLSTATE, and I have found
that some of the errno definitions don't match to the manual.

For example, the manual says that ECPG_CONVERT_BOOL could be `-207'.
However, ECPG_CONVERT_BOOL is defined as `-211' in ecpgerrno.h.

> -207 (ECPG_CONVERT_BOOL)
>
> This means the host variable is of type bool and the datum in the database is neither 't' nor 'f'. (SQLSTATE 42804)

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/ecpg-errors.html

> #define ECPG_NUMERIC_FORMAT -207
> #define ECPG_CONVERT_BOOL -211

http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/include/ecpgerrno.h?rev=1.27;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup;only_with_tag=REL9_0_STABLE

What does it mean? The manual is not up to date?

Any suggestions?

Regards,
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2010-07-22 16:57:06 Re: Using more tha one index per table
Previous Message Daniele Varrazzo 2010-07-22 09:23:11 Re: Please provide stable target anchors

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2010-07-22 13:31:30 Maximum document-size of text-search?
Previous Message Geoffrey 2010-07-22 12:37:37 Re: locating cities within a radius of another