Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table
Date: 2010-07-22 08:35:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-performance
On 22/07/10 03:27, Greg Smith wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>> If* were to 302 redirect to
>>* while 9.0 is the current release
>> (and similarly for 9.1 and so on) I suspect we'd find many more links
>> to current and fewer links to specific versions after a year or two.
> True, but this would leave people with no way to bookmark a permanent
> link to whatever is the current version, which will represent a
> regression for how some people want the site to work.

Having a quick look at the website, a simple change might be to have a 
large "CURRENT MANUALS" link above all the versioned links. That should 
help substantially.

   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Rob WultschDate: 2010-07-22 09:09:21
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table
Previous:From: Satoshi NagayasuDate: 2010-07-22 06:35:43
Subject: Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Philippe RimbaultDate: 2010-07-22 08:57:58
Subject: Re: Strange explain on partitioned tables
Previous:From: A. KretschmerDate: 2010-07-22 08:16:37
Subject: Re: why index is not working in < operation?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group