Re: leaky views, yet again

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: leaky views, yet again
Date: 2010-07-21 10:35:58
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2010/07/21 19:26), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/7/21 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>>> On the other hand, if it's enough from a performance
>>> point of view to review and mark only a few built-in functions like
>>> index operators, maybe it's ok.
>> I also think it is a worthful idea to try as a proof-of-concept.
> Yeah. So, should we mark this patch as Returned with Feedback, and
> you can submit a proof-of-concept patch for the next CF?
Yes, it's fair enough.

KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-21 10:39:28 Re: managing git disk space usage
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-07-21 10:29:38 Re: psql \conninfo command (was: Patch: psql \whoami option)