Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Reverse engineering of functions ..

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reverse engineering of functions ..
Date: 2010-06-11 16:57:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Hi Erwin,

Le 19/05/2010 23:31, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
> Aloha!
> Found another hitch with functions returning TABLE(). #191 says it all.
> On a side note, the SQL example demonstrates another small issue:
>     ... LANGUAGE sql
> is transformed to
>     ... LANGUAGE 'sql'      -- note the quotes.
> "langname" is a name, not a text. For backward compatibility the quotes
> are allowed, but we should still not add them.
> See ..
>> { LANGUAGE langname
> (...)
>> langname
>>   The name of the language that the function is implemented in. Can be
> SQL, C, internal, or the name of a user-defined procedural language.
>>   For backward compatibility, the name can be enclosed by single quotes.

Sorry for not answering sooner. I'm real busy with the french
translation of the 9.0 PostgreSQL manual.

Anyway. Worked on this, commited a fix, should work now. At least, your
funny example works :)


In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: svnDate: 2010-06-11 17:02:58
Subject: SVN Commit by guillaume: r8428 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/dlg pgadmin/schema
Previous:From: svnDate: 2010-06-11 16:55:10
Subject: SVN Commit by guillaume: r8427 - in branches/REL-1_10_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/dlg pgadmin/schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group